Interview Questions for Knifing attachment

Knifing attachments, used in various industries like agriculture, recycling, and manufacturing, come in several types, each designed for specific tasks. The primary categorization is based on the cutting mechanism and blade configuration.

• Rotating Knife Attachments: These use a spinning blade or rotor to cut material. Think of a lawnmower’s blade—it’s essentially the same principle. Subtypes include those with single or multiple blades, varying blade geometries (e.g., straight, serrated, curved), and different rotational speeds optimized for different material thicknesses and compositions. They’re great for high-volume, continuous cutting.
• Reciprocating Knife Attachments: These employ a back-and-forth, scissor-like motion. Imagine a pair of heavy-duty shears attached to a machine. These attachments are ideal for precise cutting or materials that require a gentler approach than the forceful action of a rotating blade. They can handle thicker materials effectively but may have a lower throughput than rotating options.
• Shearing Knife Attachments: These use two opposing blades that move together to shear the material. This is similar to how a guillotine works. They are excellent for producing clean, straight cuts with minimal material deformation and are often seen in applications requiring precise dimensional accuracy.
• Fixed Knife Attachments: These involve a stationary blade that a material is passed over or against. A simple example might be a food slicer where the product moves past the fixed blade. They’re useful when a consistent cutting depth is critical and material handling is straightforward.

The choice of attachment depends heavily on factors like the material being cut, the desired cut quality, the required throughput, and the overall machine setup.

Selecting the right knifing attachment is crucial for efficiency and safety. It’s a multi-step process that requires careful consideration of several factors:

1. Material Properties: What are you cutting? Is it soft, hard, brittle, flexible, fibrous, etc.? The material’s hardness, toughness, and tendency to deform will dictate the blade material, geometry, and cutting mechanism.
2. Cut Quality Requirements: Do you need precise cuts, clean cuts, or just a general shredding action? The required cut quality will influence the blade type and attachment mechanism (e.g., shearing for clean cuts, rotating for shredding).
3. Throughput Needs: How much material needs to be processed per unit time? High throughput usually favors rotating knife attachments while precise, low-volume cutting favors reciprocating or shearing types.
4. Machine Compatibility: The chosen attachment must be compatible with the machine’s power, speed, and mounting system. This includes considering the attachment’s weight, dimensions, and power requirements.
5. Safety Considerations: The attachment needs to be safe for both the operator and the machine. This involves checking for appropriate safety features like blade guards and emergency stops.

For example, a recycling facility processing plastic bottles might opt for a high-speed rotating knife attachment for high throughput, whereas a food processing plant cutting delicate vegetables might prefer a reciprocating knife attachment for precise cutting and minimal damage.

Safety and reliability are paramount in knifing attachment systems. This requires a multi-layered approach:

• Proper Design and Manufacturing: Attachments must be designed with robust materials, incorporating features that prevent accidental contact with moving parts. Precise manufacturing ensures dimensional accuracy and consistent performance, reducing the risk of malfunctions.
• Safety Features: Essential safety features include blade guards, interlocks that prevent operation when guards are open, emergency stop mechanisms, and clear safety markings. Regularly inspect these features for proper functioning.
• Regular Inspection and Maintenance: Regular checks for wear and tear, loose components, and signs of damage are crucial. A well-maintained attachment reduces the likelihood of unexpected failures and accidents.
• Operator Training: Proper training is essential. Operators need to understand the safe operating procedures, potential hazards, and emergency response protocols related to the specific knifing attachment they are using.
• Regular Lubrication: Proper lubrication minimizes friction, reducing wear and tear on moving parts and extending the lifespan of the attachment. It also reduces the risk of overheating and potential failures.

Think of it like maintaining a car – regular check-ups and preventative maintenance significantly reduce the chances of breakdowns and accidents.

Common failure modes include blade wear and breakage, bearing failure, drive system malfunctions, and damage to the mounting system. Prevention strategies include:

• Blade Wear: Regular inspection for wear and tear, timely blade replacement, and using appropriate blade materials for the application. Selecting the correct blade material is crucial – a softer blade will wear faster on hard materials.
• Bearing Failure: Regular lubrication and proper bearing selection for the application’s load and speed requirements. Using high-quality bearings and regular inspection for wear or damage are key.
• Drive System Malfunctions: Using appropriate drive components for the required torque and speed, regular maintenance of the drive system, and overload protection to prevent damage from excessive force.
• Mounting System Damage: Ensuring proper mounting and securing of the attachment to the machine, regular inspection for loose bolts or damage to the mounting structure, and using appropriate mounting hardware for the application.

Preventing these failures often involves proactive measures like regular inspections, proper lubrication, and using the correct components for the intended application. Ignoring these can lead to costly repairs or even dangerous accidents.

Proper maintenance and lubrication are crucial for ensuring the longevity, efficiency, and safety of knifing attachments. Lubrication minimizes friction between moving parts, reducing wear and tear, extending the lifespan of the components, and improving the overall efficiency of the cutting process. It also helps to prevent overheating, which can lead to premature failure.

A regular lubrication schedule, tailored to the specific attachment and operating conditions, is crucial. The type of lubricant should be carefully selected based on the materials used in the attachment and the operating temperature. The lubrication process itself should be done carefully to avoid contamination or over-lubrication, which can also lead to problems.

Think of it like lubricating a bicycle chain – regular lubrication keeps it running smoothly and prevents premature wear. Neglecting this can result in squeaking, increased wear, and ultimately chain failure.

Troubleshooting a malfunctioning knifing attachment involves a systematic approach:

1. Safety First: Ensure the power is OFF and the area is safe before attempting any troubleshooting.
2. Visual Inspection: Carefully inspect the attachment for any visible signs of damage, such as loose components, worn blades, or damaged bearings.
3. Check Drive System: Verify the drive system is functioning correctly; check belts, chains, or motors for damage or slippage.
4. Lubrication Check: Examine lubrication levels and condition. Insufficient or contaminated lubricant can cause many problems.
5. Test Operation (with caution): Once potential issues are identified and addressed, perform a brief test run with appropriate safety precautions. If the problem persists, seek professional assistance.

A systematic approach ensures efficient problem identification and resolution. Always prioritize safety and avoid working on a machine unless you are properly trained and understand its mechanisms.

Key design considerations for knifing attachments include:

• Blade Material and Geometry: The blade material must be appropriate for the material being cut, balancing wear resistance, toughness, and sharpness. The blade geometry (e.g., straight, serrated, curved) is determined by the type of cut required.
• Cutting Mechanism: The choice of cutting mechanism (rotating, reciprocating, shearing) depends on the application requirements (throughput, cut quality, etc.).
• Durability and Robustness: The attachment must be robust enough to withstand the forces and stresses involved in cutting. This involves material selection, design optimization, and appropriate safety factors.
• Maintenance Accessibility: The design should allow for easy access to components requiring regular maintenance, such as blades, bearings, and lubrication points.
• Safety Features: Incorporating safety features like blade guards, interlocks, and emergency stops is vital to protect the operator and the machine.
• Mounting System: The mounting system should provide a secure and reliable connection to the machine, ensuring proper alignment and preventing vibrations that could damage the attachment or the machine.

Careful consideration of these factors is critical in designing a safe, reliable, and efficient knifing attachment.

My experience spans a wide range of materials used in knifing attachment construction. The choice of material heavily depends on the application, the material being processed, and the desired lifespan of the attachment. For example, high-strength steel alloys like tool steels (e.g., A2, D2) are frequently used for their exceptional hardness, wear resistance, and ability to hold a sharp edge. These are ideal for cutting tough materials like rubber or thick plastics. However, they can be brittle and susceptible to chipping.

In contrast, carbide materials offer superior wear resistance to steel, making them suitable for applications involving abrasive materials. But they are more expensive and require specialized machining techniques. We also utilize hardened stainless steels for applications requiring corrosion resistance, particularly when working with food products or in damp environments. Finally, composite materials are gaining traction, offering a combination of strength and flexibility but potentially at the cost of durability depending on the specific resin and fiber combination. The selection process always involves a thorough material analysis to balance cost, performance, and longevity.

• High-strength steel alloys: Excellent hardness, wear resistance, but can be brittle.
• Carbide materials: Superior wear resistance, expensive, require specialized machining.
• Hardened stainless steels: Corrosion resistance, suitable for food processing.
• Composite materials: Combination of strength and flexibility, durability varies.

Ensuring compatibility is paramount to safety and operational efficiency. We begin by meticulously reviewing the host machine’s specifications – particularly the mounting interface, hydraulic capacity, and power requirements. The knifing attachment’s design must precisely match these parameters. This involves verifying the bolt pattern, hydraulic pressure ratings, and power consumption. Incorrect matching can lead to catastrophic failure.

Furthermore, we conduct rigorous testing to confirm the compatibility. This involves bench testing to verify the hydraulic functionality and load capacity, followed by simulated operational testing on a representative host machine. We also examine potential interference issues between the attachment and the host machine, including clearance issues and structural limitations. For instance, we need to ensure that the attachment’s swing radius doesn’t collide with any part of the machine during operation. Any necessary adjustments or modifications are made to ensure seamless integration and flawless operation.

Safety regulations are crucial. We adhere strictly to relevant OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) guidelines and any applicable industry-specific standards, such as those from ANSI (American National Standards Institute) or ISO (International Organization for Standardization). This includes incorporating safety features like emergency stops, guarding to prevent accidental contact with moving parts, and ensuring the attachment’s structural integrity can withstand operational stresses without failure. Regular inspections and maintenance procedures are also documented and implemented to ensure continued compliance.

Examples of specific safety considerations include using proper guarding to prevent operator contact with moving blades, ensuring that hydraulic lines are properly secured and leak-free, and incorporating fail-safe mechanisms to prevent unintended operation. We also conduct risk assessments to identify and mitigate potential hazards, as detailed in my answer to question 5.

CAD software is indispensable in our design process. We extensively use SolidWorks and AutoCAD for 3D modeling, simulation, and detailed drawings. This allows us to create precise virtual prototypes, conduct virtual assembly analysis to ensure proper fit, and analyze stress distributions to identify potential weak points. For example, we can use finite element analysis (FEA) within the CAD environment, as described later.

The use of CAD streamlines the design process, facilitates communication with manufacturers, and drastically reduces the need for expensive and time-consuming physical prototypes. Generating detailed manufacturing drawings from the 3D models is also much more efficient and accurate compared to traditional drafting methods. This ensures a smooth transition from design to manufacturing, ultimately minimizing production errors and delays.

Risk assessment is a systematic process we use to identify, analyze, and control potential hazards associated with the knifing attachment. We use a well-defined framework, often based on HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) principles. This involves a multidisciplinary team reviewing the design, operation, and maintenance procedures.

The process involves:

1. Identifying hazards: This involves brainstorming potential hazards such as blade breakage, hydraulic failure, unintended movement, and operator contact with moving parts.
2. Analyzing risks: Assessing the likelihood and severity of each hazard using established risk matrices. This quantifies the risk level.
3. Implementing control measures: Developing and implementing controls to mitigate the identified risks. This might include safety devices, improved guarding, operator training, and updated procedures.
4. Monitoring and review: Continuously monitoring the effectiveness of the implemented controls and reviewing the risk assessment periodically, especially after any design modifications or incidents.

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is a critical tool for optimizing knifing attachment design. We use FEA software to simulate the stresses and strains on the attachment under various loading conditions. This allows us to identify areas of high stress concentration, predict potential failure points, and optimize the design for strength and durability. For instance, we might simulate the forces exerted on the blade during cutting, or the stresses on the mounting bracket during operation.

The results of the FEA analysis are used to iteratively refine the design, ensuring that the attachment can withstand the intended operating loads without failure. This minimizes the risk of catastrophic failure during operation and contributes to the overall safety and reliability of the attachment. The data obtained from FEA guides us in selecting appropriate materials, optimizing component geometries, and verifying the structural integrity of the design, before we even build a physical prototype.

The choice of material significantly impacts the performance and lifespan of a knifing attachment. Each material offers a unique set of advantages and disadvantages.

• High-strength steel alloys:
  • Advantages: High strength, good wear resistance, relatively inexpensive.
  • Disadvantages: Can be brittle, susceptible to chipping, may require frequent sharpening.
• Carbide materials:
  • Advantages: Exceptional wear resistance, long lifespan.
  • Disadvantages: Expensive, brittle, require specialized machining.
• Hardened stainless steels:
  • Advantages: Excellent corrosion resistance, good strength.
  • Disadvantages: May not have the same wear resistance as tool steels or carbides.
• Composite materials:
  • Advantages: Lightweight, potential for high strength-to-weight ratio, can be designed for specific flexibility requirements.
  • Disadvantages: Durability and wear resistance can vary greatly depending on the specific composition, may be more susceptible to fatigue.

The optimal material selection is a trade-off based on the specific application requirements, considering factors such as cost, performance, durability, and the materials being processed.

Determining optimal cutting parameters for a knifing attachment involves a careful consideration of the material properties and the desired cut quality. It’s like choosing the right tool for a specific job – a butter knife won’t cut through a steak, and a cleaver isn’t ideal for delicate pastries.

We start by analyzing the material’s density, tensile strength, and thickness. For instance, cutting through thick, dense rubber requires different parameters than slicing through thin foam. Next, we consider the desired cut quality – do we need a clean, precise cut, or is a rougher cut acceptable? The desired speed, accuracy, and the type of cut (e.g., shearing, slicing) will all play a role.

• Blade type and geometry: The angle and sharpness of the blade are critical. A sharper blade requires less force and produces a cleaner cut.
• Cutting speed: Too fast, and the blade might overheat or damage the material; too slow, and the cutting process is inefficient.
• Blade pressure/force: This needs to be optimized to avoid material deformation or blade breakage.
• Material feed rate: The rate at which the material is fed into the cutting zone affects the cutting quality and efficiency. It’s often intertwined with cutting speed and blade pressure.

Often, we use trial-and-error testing, progressively refining the parameters until we achieve the optimal balance between cutting efficiency and cut quality. We might use sensors to monitor blade temperature and vibration, and we might even employ advanced simulation software to model cutting processes and predict optimal parameters before physical testing.

My experience encompasses a wide range of cutting tools used in knifing attachments, each with its unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice depends heavily on the application and material being cut.

• High-speed steel (HSS) blades: These are versatile and relatively inexpensive, suitable for various materials, but their lifespan can be limited depending on the application.
• Carbide blades: Significantly more durable than HSS, carbide blades are ideal for cutting abrasive materials, offering longer operational life. However, they are more brittle and expensive.
• Ceramic blades: These are exceptionally sharp and offer excellent cutting precision. They are ideal for applications requiring a very clean and smooth cut, but they’re more fragile than HSS or carbide blades.
• Specialized blades: Depending on the application, I’ve worked with blades designed for specific materials like textiles, plastics, or metals. These might have specialized coatings or geometries to enhance performance.

For example, in one project involving the cutting of reinforced plastics, carbide blades significantly outperformed HSS blades due to their superior resistance to wear caused by the abrasive fiberglass reinforcements. Conversely, when cutting delicate fabrics, ceramic blades delivered the cleanest cuts with minimal fiber damage.

Data from knifing attachment performance monitoring is crucial for ensuring optimal operation, identifying potential problems early, and extending the life of the equipment. This data typically includes cutting force, blade temperature, vibration levels, and cutting speed.

I typically use data acquisition systems to collect this data in real-time, which is then analyzed using specialized software. The data is visualized through charts and graphs to identify patterns and trends. For example, a sudden increase in cutting force could indicate blade dulling or material inconsistency. Similarly, high vibration levels might point to an imbalance or mechanical failure. Increased blade temperature could indicate insufficient lubrication or excessive cutting speed.

Interpretation of this data allows for preventative maintenance – we can replace blades before they fail, adjust cutting parameters to prevent overheating, or detect mechanical issues before they lead to costly downtime. Predictive maintenance techniques leverage historical data to anticipate future failures and plan maintenance proactively.

Integrating knifing attachments into automated systems is a common practice in various industries, ranging from packaging to manufacturing. The process involves careful selection of the attachment, appropriate robotic interfaces, and safety considerations.

We typically use programmable logic controllers (PLCs) to control the knifing attachment’s operation, integrating it with the overall automation system. Sensors provide feedback on the cutting process, allowing the PLC to adjust parameters dynamically in response to changing conditions. This could involve adjusting the feed rate based on material thickness or altering blade pressure based on feedback from a force sensor.

Safety is paramount in such applications. We employ various safety mechanisms, including emergency stop buttons, light curtains, and interlocks to ensure safe operation and prevent accidents. Proper programming and testing are essential to ensure the system operates as intended and does not pose any risk to personnel or equipment.

For example, I worked on a project integrating a knifing attachment into a robotic system for automated packaging. The PLC controlled the robot’s movements, the knifing attachment’s operation, and ensured safe transitions between different stages of the packaging process.

Ensuring precision and accuracy in knifing attachment operation involves a multi-faceted approach, focusing on mechanical alignment, blade sharpness, and process control.

• Precise mechanical alignment: Proper alignment of the blade relative to the material is critical. This often involves precise adjustments and regular calibration to maintain accuracy.
• Sharp blades: Dull blades lead to inaccurate cuts and increased wear on the attachment. Regular sharpening or blade replacement is crucial. Blade condition monitoring systems can provide real-time information about blade sharpness and optimize the replacement schedule.
• Process control: Maintaining consistent cutting parameters such as speed, pressure, and feed rate is essential for precision. This often involves the use of closed-loop control systems that continuously adjust parameters based on real-time feedback.
• Material handling: Ensuring consistent material presentation to the cutting zone is vital. Inconsistent feeding of material can lead to inaccurate cuts. Appropriate material handling systems are crucial for maintaining precision.

For instance, in one project involving the trimming of precision-cut parts, we employed a closed-loop control system that used a vision system to monitor the cut quality and adjust cutting parameters in real-time, ensuring consistent precision even with variations in material dimensions.

Environmental considerations related to knifing attachments primarily revolve around noise pollution, waste generation, and potential emissions. It’s like considering the footprint of any industrial process – we must minimize negative impacts.

• Noise reduction: Knifing attachments can generate significant noise. Enclosing the cutting zone or using noise-dampening materials can help mitigate this. We often design and select cutting tools and attachments that minimize operational noise.
• Waste management: The cutting process generates waste materials. Proper waste disposal and recycling processes are critical. This includes selecting recyclable blade materials and implementing efficient waste collection systems.
• Emissions: Depending on the material being cut and the cutting process, there might be airborne emissions. Proper ventilation and air filtration systems can help control these emissions and ensure worker safety.
• Energy consumption: Cutting operations consume energy. Optimizing cutting parameters and using energy-efficient equipment can help minimize energy use.

For example, in an application involving the cutting of foam, we implemented a closed-loop system to optimize the cutting speed and pressure, reducing both energy consumption and waste generation. We also used recycled materials wherever possible in the construction of the attachment.

Optimizing the lifespan and performance of a knifing attachment is a proactive approach that incorporates preventative maintenance, proper operation, and careful selection of components.

• Preventative maintenance: Regular inspection and cleaning of the attachment are crucial. This includes checking for wear and tear on the blades, lubrication of moving parts, and tightening of fasteners.
• Proper operation: Operating the attachment within its specified parameters is vital to prevent premature wear and damage. Avoiding overloading the attachment and using appropriate cutting speeds and pressures extend its lifespan.
• High-quality components: Choosing high-quality blades and other components increases the attachment’s longevity. Selecting materials resistant to wear and corrosion contributes to extended operational life.
• Lubrication: Proper lubrication of moving parts reduces friction and wear, extending the attachment’s life and enhancing performance.

For instance, by implementing a scheduled maintenance program including regular blade inspections and lubrication, we extended the operational lifespan of a knifing attachment in a high-volume production line by over 25%, reducing replacement costs and downtime. We also trained operators on proper usage, which minimizes the risk of premature wear.

My experience encompasses a wide range of knifing attachment drives and power systems. I’ve worked extensively with hydraulic, pneumatic, and electric systems, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Hydraulic systems, for instance, offer high power density and precise control, making them ideal for heavy-duty applications like cutting large volumes of material in construction or demolition. However, they can be complex and require regular maintenance. Pneumatic systems are simpler, cleaner, and often safer, especially in explosive environments, but they might lack the precision and power of hydraulic systems. Electric systems, increasingly popular due to advancements in motor technology, offer precise control, are environmentally friendly, and require less maintenance, but may have limitations in power output for some demanding tasks. I’ve personally designed and implemented systems utilizing each of these technologies, tailoring the choice to the specific application’s requirements regarding power, precision, and environmental considerations.

• Hydraulic: Worked on a project involving a hydraulically-driven knifing attachment for a large-scale recycling facility, optimizing the system for efficient material processing and minimal downtime.
• Pneumatic: Developed a pneumatic system for a smaller-scale agricultural application, prioritizing safety and ease of maintenance in a potentially dusty environment.
• Electric: Designed an electric-powered knifing attachment for a precision cutting application in the aerospace industry, focusing on accuracy and repeatability.

Calculating the forces and stresses on a knifing attachment during operation requires a multi-faceted approach, combining theoretical calculations with empirical data. We start by analyzing the geometry of the knife and the material being cut. Factors such as the knife’s angle, material properties (strength, hardness, toughness), cutting speed, and the applied force all play a crucial role. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is a powerful tool in this process. FEA software allows us to model the attachment, simulating the cutting process and predicting stress concentrations and potential points of failure. This helps us optimize the design for strength and durability. Experimental validation is also crucial. We perform physical tests on prototypes, measuring forces and strains using sensors and strain gauges. This data helps us refine our theoretical models and ensure the attachment can withstand the expected loads. This iterative process of simulation and validation ensures a robust and safe design.

This is a simplified example. Actual calculations are much more complex and involve considerations of friction, dynamic forces, and material deformation.

My experience with manufacturing processes for knifing attachments includes casting, forging, machining, and additive manufacturing (3D printing). Casting is cost-effective for high-volume production of complex shapes, but might require significant post-processing. Forging yields superior strength and durability, especially for high-stress components, although it’s more expensive. Machining offers precision and allows for intricate designs, but can be time-consuming and generate significant material waste. Finally, additive manufacturing enables rapid prototyping and the creation of complex geometries difficult to produce using traditional methods. The selection of the manufacturing process depends on factors like the design complexity, required strength, production volume, and cost constraints. For example, a high-volume, simpler design might be best suited for casting, while a unique, high-strength component might be better forged or machined from a high-strength material. In one project, we utilized additive manufacturing to create a custom-designed knifing attachment for a limited production run, allowing for rapid iterations and optimized performance before moving to a more cost-effective manufacturing process for mass production.

In collaborative team environments, I focus on clear communication, active listening, and a proactive approach. I believe in establishing strong working relationships based on mutual respect and trust. I actively participate in brainstorming sessions, offering constructive feedback and creative solutions. I am comfortable taking on leadership roles when appropriate, but I also readily embrace support roles to ensure the project’s overall success. For example, on a recent project, I took the lead in coordinating the FEA simulations while working closely with the manufacturing team to ensure the design was manufacturable. Furthermore, I believe in the importance of documenting every design decision and progress, fostering transparency and knowledge sharing within the team. My aim is always to contribute to a positive and productive team dynamic where every member feels valued and empowered.

Staying updated on advancements in knifing attachment design and application requires a multi-pronged approach. I regularly attend industry conferences and trade shows, networking with peers and learning about the latest technologies. I subscribe to relevant industry publications and journals, keeping abreast of new materials, manufacturing techniques, and design methodologies. I actively participate in online forums and communities, engaging in discussions and exchanging knowledge with experts in the field. Furthermore, I dedicate time to independent research, exploring innovative solutions and emerging trends. This continuous learning process ensures I remain at the forefront of the field, capable of integrating the latest advancements into my designs and projects. For example, recently I have been researching the applications of advanced materials, such as wear-resistant coatings and high-strength alloys, to improve the longevity and performance of knifing attachments.

During a project involving a high-speed knifing attachment for a food processing plant, we encountered unexpected vibrations that were compromising the precision of the cuts and potentially damaging the equipment. The initial design, based on simulations, appeared sound, but the real-world conditions revealed unforeseen resonance frequencies. To solve this, we first systematically analyzed the vibration patterns using accelerometers. We then employed a combination of strategies: modifying the attachment’s geometry to alter its natural frequencies, adding damping materials to absorb vibrations, and optimizing the control system to minimize oscillatory forces. This multi-faceted approach, involving collaboration with the control systems engineer and material scientist, led to a successful resolution, demonstrating the importance of integrated problem-solving and a willingness to adapt and iterate.

My salary expectations are commensurate with my experience, skills, and the responsibilities of this role. I am open to discussing a competitive compensation package that reflects the market value of my expertise and contributions to your organization. I would be happy to provide a more precise figure after reviewing the complete job description and further discussing the specifics of the role.